View Single Post
Old 04-06-07, 08:00 PM   #11
P_Funk
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 2,537
Downloads: 129
Uploads: 0
Default

This is so ironic. We're ready to bury the Democratic House Speaker because she might have allegedly done something slightly unconstitutional, while we just look the other way on Bush doing what he will when laws and constitutions and Geneva Conventions don't fit his policy model.

And in the mean time while Bush won't deal with the Democrats in power they just have to sit there for 2 more years and just wait for Bush's term to be up and then hope they get the Presidency before they can do anything at all to correct what they view as being wrong with the way America is heading? Why were the Democrats elected at all then? To stand there and be bi-partisam while they just say "yes sir" to all of Bush's policy demands on the budget? What is the point of the House if they can't do ANYTHING? They obviously can't check the White House's executive powers since thats just wrong to leave the troops hanging. but then Bush won't budge on anything.

Seriously this is just an internal-American game of political brinksmanship where the established power won't budge for any kind of compromise wth the newly elected oppostion.

This is obviously a case of the right wing thinking that they can do whatever they want while the left wing can't do anything that the right wing doesn't like or else its unconstitutional. Sounds like theres been alot of progress in bi-partisanism lately.
__________________


P_Funk is offline   Reply With Quote