Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RocketDog
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by flintlock
I'm sure the design decision behind this was one of necessity. Getting SH4 to natively support 16:10 aspect ratios with a wider field of view would have been a major technical undertaking.
|
I would be interested to know a bit more about why the devs did lock it into 1024x768, 4:3 and no FSAA. Out-of-the-box SH3 is locked in 1024x768, but the community hack makes it perfectly playable in other resolutions. I use 1600x1200 with 4xFSAA and 4xAF and it storms along without any problems at all. If a hack could make it work, it can't be that much of a problem so why on Earth did the devs not do the same thing in both SH3 and SH4? Perplexing.
Cheers,
RD. |
My guess.. as I've said in other posts is that either they just cut the time needed to finish and test high res... OR based on the fact that I still think the periscope view is in a higher res.. that the 3D was supposed to be dynamic, that it would auto-adjust to a set FPS speed, they didn't implement for time contraints.