View Single Post
Old 03-22-07, 03:21 PM   #7
Threadfin
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,163
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep Six
Kinda more realistic with crew around you doing there jobs
In SH3 the weapon officer assistance was not realistic in the sense that it was the skipper's job to obtain targeting info such as target identification, AoB and range. The weapons officer made sure tubes were prepared, the torpedo settings were correct, etc. He would have no responsibility in regards to obtaining target info.

Weapons officer assistance in SH3 is an aid, it is a departure from realism. For some reason I feel compelled to refute this claim, and have done so hundreds of times with no effect . I can think of plenty of reasons to use weapon's officer assistance to fire torpedos, but realism is not one of them.
__________________
What? Behind the rabbit?
Threadfin is offline   Reply With Quote