Hopefully not..
I believe the message is: Stop releasing games with so obvious bugs?
I approve with ACsoft`s opinion here. Even I have a limit, ofcourse, you guys are allowed your own opinion and are fully within the right to speak out.
So I might just as well grab my right to my loud opinion and critisism right now. And atleast be given the honour to ask: Ubisoft, Why did you release a game with such obvious bugs and flaws? (TDC Stadimeter.) (In-Game resolution un-changeable as well as other graphical features like HD-Bloom effects and such.) (DUD torpedoes and No Damage even tho both of theese are turned off.) (Crew members of sinking ship simply dying flat on the spot just before the water reaches them, life boats spawning 50 yards away instead of a loaring animation..)
Other then that, if I may add, the game looks great, and I haven`t given up on it, and am far away from boicotting it. I am just merely, by humble opinion indeed, pointing out that ACSoft has a point here, just as much as many had the right to boicott SH3 because of Starforce, people do have the right to boicott SH4 because of both bugs (Mentioned above.) and feature problems (Lack of historic knowledge: Lancaster bombers?? No Akagi class?, etc etc.) I could live with the Lancaster, but not without the Akagi (We are in the pacific Gentlemen.)
As said, I am looking forward to the patch, when I can use the TDC without bug`s, that is what I call atleast a good start
And I am with no single intention trying to undermine Ubisoft directly, and do feel free to correct any/all my bug statements so far, I am not sure whether or not I got them right.
Ur friend in the Pacific Ocean.
Red Hammer