I can't understand why this discussion took this turn.
On my point of wiew, UE and US and the so called third world have very little to do with the starting post.
Here is only matter of wrong and stupid use of statistics.
I have a relationship with one of the richest man of my country (not Berlusconi, anyway) and I could agree that, forced by his businnes, he really has very short free time.
His sons and daughters, anyway, have more free time than anybody I could think: they simply waste their lives dropping off the window daddy's money.
I also know another one with the same attitude: he was rich, now is poor, never made something intelligent during about fourty years of life.
Someone really poor has probably plenty of free time, as an unemployed homeless hardly can spend his days working; not by his choice, simply by a nasty doom hard to modify.
A sort of slave, with a terrible job in mines, fields, illegal factory, and so on has very little free time; maybe he doesn't know at all these strange words.
I could break the fingers to the idiot who wrote the rewiew.
|