View Single Post
Old 01-12-07, 03:14 PM   #10
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

If I recall correctly (its been a few months sinces I've read up) the Navy did a cost of operation analysis on Nuclear power and it really is more costly in terms of the manufacturing, maintainance, and personel cost to have nuclear power. Even with the saving on fuel, the overall cost over the lifetime of the ship is much higher for nukes. Only after fuel cost reach 4-5 times the dollar per barrel that they do atm do the cost equalize. And with the navy budget strapped for cash as it is its really not worth it until in a few decades oil prices are much higher than they are right now.
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote