SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Ducimus · 01-12-07, 01:08 AM

An oversight by GWX correcting the oversights of UBI.

Most research would indicate that the IX/2 tower wasnt historiclaly avialable until sometime in 42. The IX/3 tower in 43.

Ubi, for whatever reason had all the type 9 towers appearing a year before they historically should have. GWX's oversight was not correcting the tech tree timeline in the equipment upgrade menus. On the otherhand, maybe the file is embedded somewhere and they coudlnt change it. I don't know really.. Ive thought about this in the past but never really pursued it.

01-12-07, 01:08 AM	#2
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	An oversight by GWX correcting the oversights of UBI. Most research would indicate that the IX/2 tower wasnt historiclaly avialable until sometime in 42. The IX/3 tower in 43. Ubi, for whatever reason had all the type 9 towers appearing a year before they historically should have. GWX's oversight was not correcting the tech tree timeline in the equipment upgrade menus. On the otherhand, maybe the file is embedded somewhere and they coudlnt change it. I don't know really.. Ive thought about this in the past but never really pursued it.