[TteFAboB]

My intention is not to be harsh but to be honest. If my harshness is offensive please point to me where it is (given the validity of the first sentence of this paragraph, there can only be harshness left because I still haven't noticed it) and I will first apologize, then correct myself.

EDIT: And as we're defining what we're for here, I take this opportunity to repeat what I told jumpy: That I am all for freedom, that if people want to do what I describe in my previous post in this thread, that is, for example, to copy and paste the entire content of the Fourth International post by post, I don't care the slightest and offer no opposition to such a thing. I hope that if any of you guys have read my post you haven't finished with the impression that I suggest locking anything, I'm contesting the concept and purpose of a discussion or a conversation and the difference of those from sheer spamming. I've never contested the locking of any thread but I've never asked for it either. I have supported Takeda after he locked the "dark ages" thread because he was receiving flak from it and that's it.

As far as I care anybody can do whatever they want as long as they don't break the rules or commit any crime.