View Single Post
Old 01-08-07, 08:00 PM   #27
Kpt. Lehmann
GWX Project Director
 
Kpt. Lehmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,996
Downloads: 124
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carotio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carotio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann
Regarding the inability of players to the "auto-target" function mentioned here to hit specific critical locations on a ship:

1) If we broke it... I'M GLAD BROKE IT!!!

2) I see it as Ref sees it... I feel it to be a really rotten cheat. It allows for an automatic critical hit that delivers maximum force. (Personally I feel it is STUPID.)

3) As long as I'm the GWX project manager... It will remain as it is... disabled. Yes I feel quite strongly about this.

4) We will not build a modlet that fixes it.

5) Sorry if I sound harsh... feel free to complain... Don't bother trying to talk me out of it... and don't pester GWX Dev Teamers about a fix. I'm not backing up from this position. Even casual gamers can learn to live without this in GWX.
Okay, please don't get me wrong here:
GWX offers a lot of new things compared to stock, NYGM, RuB, IUB, Living_SH3, UWAC and whatever there are of modpacks out there!
Especially, I think of all the new eye candy things of GWX such as bridges, new units and other stuff, and I wonder of all of these new things have ever been offered as single mods through subsim or UBRS?

I know, I am somehow "special" in the eyes of GWX team or its users, because I say this: we are some people who like the new eye candy of GWX and other mods, but actually prefer some of the arcade game style from stock!
Please don't just say choose GWX or don't choose GWX!
This has been a main reason for me to make tweak mods, not to destroy anything, just to get the eye candy for an arcade game style! A kind of "kids version" as another subsim user expressed it once...

So, if you or any other team member won't "unfix" GWX features back to stock version, whether because of time or interest, do you then mind if I or any other do it then?

(If you cannot read between the lines, then this was actually a permission question...)
@Carotio,
Then you are being an opportunist and hijacking this thread.

To answer one of your questions above... NO! Much of what is in GWX was made by the GWX dev team and was not offered anywhere else. Too much to list here right now. There are literally THOUSANDS of elements that were made specifically for GWX.

Now SHOVE OFF and stop pestering me!
When I'm not asking, I'm accused of being a thief!
When I finally do ask, I'm pestering you????

I'm sorry! But this way, you just give the perfect pretext for me or anybody else NOT to ask in the future!
You said it yourself earlier! An apology means nothing if the behaviour continues!
Now, I broke my previous behaviour and DID ask, and what is the reply?
quote: "SHOVE OFF"

Somehow, I just knew something like this would be the answer... Anything I do from now on in your eyes is bad, whether I ask or not? Hmmm... :hmm:

Well, I'm not hi-jacking this thread in any way, cause I just give the info again:

@anybody else wanting the auto-aim back
yes, it has been done (but not by me!), the mod was only offered in ubisoft english forum, as far as I know!
@Carotio
Negative, you are indeed hijacking the thread and you have basically just admitted to doing so.

You are simply trying to maneuver the situation to get what you want and to (yet again) make yourself out to be a martyr in the process. This is a continuance of the SAME OLD BEHAVIOR YOU'VE EXHIBITED BEFORE!

LOL. Same old same old vulture stuff from you.

"Mommy! Daddy! The big bad Grey Wolves are picking on me! They're being bullies! WAAAaaaa!!!"

You can continue to expect resistance any time you screw with GWX files.

Without our help, you won't be able to properly implement automatically targetable zones for the new GWX ships anyway.
__________________

www.thegreywolves.com
All you need is good men. - Heinrich Lehmann-Willenbrock
Kpt. Lehmann is offline   Reply With Quote