SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post - Game Play Observations of GWX after 4-5 Days

edjcox · 12-28-06, 12:53 AM

When a player posts a concern his legitimacy should not be in question.

We all know that GWX made many changes to enhance realism. The positive bouyancy one is a good change. To start a mission when in close proximity to enemy vessels with your conning tower exposed is not. This immediatly alerts the DD's and other vessels to your presence and initiates AI attack and evasion tactics from the Merchants and other target vessels. Short of stupidity no Commander would get into the predicament intentionally. So GWX's team may consider starting at a concealed depth and then allowing rise and bouyancy to expose the Sub if the Commander takes no action to prevent the exposure. That is all the asker wanted..

12-28-06, 12:53 AM	#5
edjcox Engineer Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Shang Gri La Posts: 219 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 0	Poor responses When a player posts a concern his legitimacy should not be in question. We all know that GWX made many changes to enhance realism. The positive bouyancy one is a good change. To start a mission when in close proximity to enemy vessels with your conning tower exposed is not. This immediatly alerts the DD's and other vessels to your presence and initiates AI attack and evasion tactics from the Merchants and other target vessels. Short of stupidity no Commander would get into the predicament intentionally. So GWX's team may consider starting at a concealed depth and then allowing rise and bouyancy to expose the Sub if the Commander takes no action to prevent the exposure. That is all the asker wanted.. __________________ EJ Cox http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...jcox/usaCa.gif Last edited by edjcox; 12-28-06 at 01:21 AM.