Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Laffertytig
i have to say im very surprised at your comments serbuto. how anyone could get any joy playin vanilla SH3 is beyond me but it is all about opinions and i respect yours. if it wasnt for mods i wouldvr shelved this game 1 month after i bought it in april last year.
|
Perhaps, it would be somewhat easier for you in this case if you could go back and read various reviews and comments by SH3 players on these forums about how good SH3 is (something like "Best sub simulator ever") or how talanted the SH3 Devs are, and how SH3 will live for ages, right after the release of the game and after one month after the release and after two, three month...
Then after some time, some people started to complain how incredibly buggy, unfinished vanilla SH3 is and how Devs did not do a good job. Some claimed that they would drop it like in two-three weeks after buying if there was no modding and mods like RUB, IUB, etc.
This "progressed" further and f.e. recently I saw that some people started to call vanilla SH3 arcade game and some already call SH3 devs stupid.
So, I guess all those reviewers did not know what they are taking about (probably just wanted to please UBISOFT) and all the quite positive reviews were wrong including Subsim's review which gave SH3 ten out of ten? I guess UBISOFT started to make SH4 only because of its love to simulators, not because of profits on "boring and buggy" SH3 out of box?
The number of peoples coming to SH3 forums were always much higher as compared to e.g. SH2 which was recognised as a game with serious drawbacks both by reviewers and by the players. But even for SH2 I do not recall people saying that they shelved SH2 in two(!) weeks after they got it.
Anyhow, I was modding both SH2 and SH3 for quite some time and in my opinion any mod for SH3, no matter how damn good it is, is only a mod/tweaks for a solid SH3 simulator.