View Single Post
Old 12-14-06, 02:48 PM   #9
AS
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 275
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 0
Default

Sorry to say so, but you are WRONG if you compare the VIIb depth (90m) to that of a U.S. Sub. The reason is quite simple: The German Navy calculated a safety-factor of 2.5 for their "operational depth", while the U.S Navy calculated with approx. 1.5. This means:

Type VII U-Boat: 100m "safe" operational depth, multiplied by the factor 2.5 = 250m assumed maximum depth close to crash depth (today we know that the crash depth assumption were too pessimistic in those days, as you all know, U-Boats could go a bit deeper than 250m)

US-Sub: 90m (later 120m) operational depth, multiplied by 1.5 = 135 (respectively 180m) maximum depth near crash depth.

So, U.S. subs couldnīt go very deep, but they were not meant to, either, because in the Pacific both crash dive time (VIIc: 25sec., US Gato: 50sec.) and maximum depth didnīt play such an important role, whereas long range travelling, a huge torpedoe load-out and comparatively comfy crew accomodations were much more important for the Pacific theatre.

My two cents, AS
__________________
Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong. (Oscar Wilde)
AS is offline   Reply With Quote