View Single Post
Old 11-28-06, 07:54 AM   #44
bigboywooly
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing

3) While the modifications that have been made to SH3 by the community are fantastic, have have certainly iproved the experience, it is disingenuous to imply that the game was not worth playing before they came out. More and more I see posts that imply that the only thing that makes SH3 worthwhile are the mods. This is not only incorrect, but insulting to the developers.

JCC
Have to disagree there John
After less than a month my game was relegated to the bottom of a pile until I blundered on here
Without the mods I would have given up a long time ago
No its not too much to expect a game to be playable out of the box without a series of patches that not only improved things but made others worse - the camera " bounce " on land units after the 1.4 patch IIRC
Groundbreaking it may have been but why do half a job ?
Yes time and money are a constraint but apart from the obvious bugs where are the wolfpacks and why the hell are the axis nations all using C2/C3/T2 and T3 ships ?
A little attention to detail would have been nice and a greater stock of included ships without expecting the community to pick up after them

There are a huge number of ppl that dont even know this site and mods exist
Ask them how they feel about the game - its easy to say the stock game isnt that bad but it is
After a reinstall the other week I had a patrol in the stock game
Didnt even play for half an hour before installing some mods

And I have no doubt we will be having this conversation after SHIV is released

I can fully understand dudtorpedo's frustrations
He may not have expressed himself in the right way but there is no denying the fact the stock game is woeful at best
__________________


My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41
bigboywooly is offline   Reply With Quote