On-topic: As far as I get it,
NYGM is for those craving as much realism and historical accuracy as possible, while
GW is for those craving more content (new ships, cities, nations, battles, etc.) and the "
"wow!" effect" provided by the above-mentioned and the improved graphics.
Off-topic:
Quote:
|
The way the world goes, as soon as SHIV is out, you probably will find this forum mostly empty I guess...
|
Which is my biggest fear with
Norwegian Operations: That I won't finish it before Ubisoft finishes
Silent Hunter 4. The game's estimated "ETA" is first quarter 2007, and while I don't have anywhere near a set release date for
NorOps, but it's not going to be out any time soon. I'm litterally racing Ubisoft, and I do not like it.
Quote:
|
Wrong assumption sailor. For many players, the true Uboat war means Atlantic Ocean not Pacific. SH 3 got a loooong life ahead especially with those great mods in the pipeline.
|
With respect - every time a game sequel is imminent, a lot of players swear they'll stay with the current title, yet when the sequel comes out, many of those self-professed "loyalists" will jump ship to the sequel faster than you can say "Prequel Quisling".
Of course I can't assume anything on an individual basis, but I'm
very certain that
many people will jump ship when
Silent Hunter 4 is out. Whether
Silent Hunter III will die early or live for many more years, as for example
Battlefield 1942 did when
'Vietnam came out, I have no idea. Probably the latter.