Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wulfmann
I never said or inferred that in any way and consider your observation either ignorant or intentionally provocative.
|
I wasn't trying to provoke anything but an honest answer of who used code from whom.
You admit that X-1 files were downloaded before their product was released:
The very first act of theft occurred when members here illegally downloaded X-1 files from an unsecured site (if you don’t lock the door stealing is OK?) of everything they had long before any release or any formulation of what they would make as their first expansion.
You admit that files from free mods by other authors were used as part of the X-1 product:
So, when some free mods showed up on the first expansion (technically owned by UBI so legit for X-1 to use anyway) it was in fact what goes around comes around.
You justify this use of others work by X-1 by stating that only X-1 is licensed by UbiSoft to make modifications to SH3 files.
So my question was this:
Which came first, community work used by X-1 or X-1's work downloaded by the community which then re-appeared in X-1's product?
Was your reference to "what goes around comes around" referring to:
A) X-1 used other peoples works since some people had downloaded code from X-1 before the product came out. X-1's products are based on community work because they are the only ones licensed to actually do so and therefore can use any files/work based on SH3 as a licensee.
or
B) Community work was based on code downloaded from X-1 so therefore X-1 used other peoples work in their product. X-1's products include uncredited community work because the community, or portions thereof, downloaded X-1's work previously.
As far as I can tell X-1 used other peoples code and work under the excuse of "we're licensed and you're not". Am I wrong?