View Single Post
Old 10-11-06, 11:03 AM   #11
Immacolata
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 798
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredbass
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
You've got radicals who kill anyone who supports democracy. And you've got the other side who's killing them. And you've got the innocent bystanders in between.
What difference does it make? Dead is dead. Give it a 20% variance and it's still a hell of a lot.
.

It's a sad situation, but we're trying. To avoid your worst fears, The U.S. should double the number of troops or the Iraqis should triple the size of theirs.
IF the us never went there chasing weapons of mass deception in the first place a safe bet would be that a lot more people would have been alive. Oppressed, but alive. Im sure if you asked the dead people they would pick saddams iron rule over the US militarys jihad magnetic rule in a heart beat.

The political side of it is possibly muddles: the numbers are exaggarated to use as an argument against the war and the bush administration or parts thereof. The humanitarian side of it is however clear cut. Be it 300000 or 600000 - so many casualties are not acceptable. Saddam was a bastard, but at least he was THIER bastard!
__________________

"The power of the executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious, and the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- W. Churchill

Last edited by Immacolata; 10-11-06 at 11:06 AM.
Immacolata is offline   Reply With Quote