Quote:
|
Originally Posted by August
Easy enough Skybird. What the world would, or will, be like had Saddam been allowed to remain in power is, and can be nothing but, pure speculation. You can make lengthy boring posts citing whichever so called experts happen to fit your opinions of the moment but it "proves" absolutely nothing.
|
If you don't have more than only nothing I wonder why you even show up and tell people they are all wrong and should prove what they say. Maybe I make lengthy boring posts, but you only have to say you beloieve this or that - and do not care to check if your beliefs cform a consistent system that is in congruence with other hints from other source, and macthes reality. Now you declare success of operation - for people not knowing what would have happened if Saddam would have been left alone. That is no logic, but circular argument only, a cheap trick only. at the same time when you say noone can know - you declare success the mess that was created. How can you do that when you say that nobody knows the alternative'S outcome - which means you cannot compare both alterntaives and thus judge which one is the better one...? you are contradicting yourself, only to evade amditting the total failure of the calculation towards the Iraq formula. If the military and intel guys would assist your beliefs, you would hail them, but since they violate your belief what it should have been, you declare all of them as incompetent fools who have to say nothing.
August - it is laughable what you do. Can't you see that yourself...?
Anyway, this part of the debate is a deja vu only. So forgive that I leave you alone with your private fancies.