View Single Post
Old 09-29-06, 07:44 AM   #61
Immacolata
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 798
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August
While it is easy to look back in hindsight and blame Bill Clinton, the full scale and nature of the terrorist threat was not widely appreciated until 9/11. Still: Bill Clinton did not fully grasp that he was at war. Nor did he intuit that war requires overcoming bureaucratic objections and a democracy's natural reluctance to use force. That is a hard lesson. But it is better to learn it from studying the Clinton years than reliving them.
Would anyone have believed the seriousness of this untill the 9/11? Could anyone truly say we are at war and make the majority of people believe it? It is easy to say bureaucracy stopped it from happening. Sometimes people forget that bureaucracy is here to make sure things happen BY the book. It is really nasty to be at the receiving end of someone who dodges the books. You have no protection. After 9/11, everyone saw that the books might need some new text, however.
__________________

"The power of the executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious, and the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- W. Churchill
Immacolata is offline   Reply With Quote