Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scandium
If there's any substance to the rumour of Bin Laden's death (of natural causes while roaming the ME a free man not so good, little satisfaction there) then that could be the Oct surprise. I'm hoping whathever the cause, that he is either dead or captured as this guy's been on the loose far too long for public enemy #1.
Either way of course the fight goes on, but the "war"? Never been fond of that "war on terror" phrase. Great campaign slogan, absolutely useless in terms of defining accurately how one must deal with terrorism.
|
Of course it does not matter if bin Laden is alive, dead or vacationing in Tahiti.
If the reports are true, and this does seem to be a big if, it will not change America's problems and policies what-so-ever. Furthermore, if he has still not died from dissease or old age at this point, it is that which remains his biggest threat for the future, not the US military.
I agree with the inappropriate nature of the term 'War on Terror', but it is the term used. Personally, I have a strong preference for 'Middle Eastern Foriegn Policy Blunder'. Catchy, isn't it?