View Single Post
Old 09-07-06, 08:59 PM   #20
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Nope. Democrats have proven they have no will to fight terrorists. Their entire strategy now is to surrender and disgracefully leave before we have any stability in Iraq. That takes time, and the Democrat Party has shown they don't have the fortitude to do it.
Not one terrorist attack under the democrats was the magnitude of 9/11. Should we hang that on republicans? Then on top of that the given enemy was Afganistan. Now look what is happening, the Taliban is on a comeback and we can't do squat about it? Why? Because the republicans attacked Iraq on top of it before the work was finished in Afganistan and now we are tied down in Iraq. Yeah the republicans are doing a bang up job fighting terror. How many Iraqi's die a day since we liberated them?
So you want a standing U.S. army in Iraq? How long do you think it will fly? Another two or five or ten years? How many years is it worth? Think our all volunteer force is going to stay volunteer? How much can we afford? Our debt is going through the roof. How long can we financialy handle it. How long will voters stand for it?

Can the democrats do any better? I seriously doubt it. Nothing we do can stabilize the region. Our hands would have been more then full enough with Afganistan by itself.

Do I have an idea of what would work? No, I really don't and that's sad. There are no right choices.

Last edited by bradclark1; 09-07-06 at 09:01 PM.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote