Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
|
If he did that and the board decided to still not address the problem, then there must be a good reason for it since a board of several high ranking or political party members would not usually put their service men and women in harms way no matter what the costs were to fix it.
|
I think this link provides a sufficent example of how wrong that statement is.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14704366/from/RS.2/
Quote:
|
Usually going to the legal department at any base would be a good start.
|
You watch too many JAG shows. As a JAG officer once said to me "Who do you think writes our evaluation reports?"
Quote:
|
In doing what he did, he has put those service men and women at risk until the "problem" can be properly resolved.
|
No. A corrupt Lockheed and CG brass put those service men and women at risk due to corporate greed.You think those deficiencies are going to go unattended too now? |
None of what you state changes the fact that this guy is guilty of breaching a security clearance by blabbering his mouth off without premission to the world about potential weaknesses of US Coast Guard boats.
A military member would not be allowed to just go talk to the media without having first gone through his or her public affairs officer (PAO). To do so, could land that military member in the stockade or brig! Granted this guy isn't a military member, but he is still under an oath to support and defend the United States if he has any work to do with the US government and holds a secuirty clearance.
This guy really needs his rear handed to him. I say, Lock'm in the stocks and have people throw rotten fruit and vegtables at him for a week or two.