[Safe-Keeper]

Before asking for a MMO, ask for Destoryer command 2 or IV

Er... OK. Ubi, can we have a game called Silent Hunter IV (it's already underway? Swell!) with an expansion pack called Destroyer Command 2 (you're thinking about it? Awesome!)?

There. Now, Ubi, can we have an MMO?

[admit it, galileo, you just got "owned"]

and when you see the the capacity of ubisoft to manage multiplayer game:
SH4 only 4 online :rotfl:

That's indicative of their capacity? And here I sat thinking it was just that they prioritized single-player over multi-player.

only 4 to make a MMO

That was a joke, right?

How many people could play together in Warcraft III? Eight.
How many can play together in World of Warcraft, should they for some odd reason want to? Thousands.

At MS we have a joke about SH4:
Better than punkbuster, MPA the new anti-cheat protection of SH4. MPA mean Multi Player Alone.
( (c) Crabe Tambour, 2006 ).

Seeing wolf-packs weren't really bigger than that, I don't see the problem.

A wolf-pack of three submarines against a fleet of escort ships controlled by a fourth player? Suits me just fine.

Ubi$oft did not (never) hear the voice of the community so a MMO is a Dream, perhaps for SH-20 when silent Hunter will not be published by this editor.

Nonsense. Ubisoft keeps a close eye on this community and respects us.

Silent Hunter III was never really finished with all the features they wanted to add, but they did delay it for half a year to include dynamic campaigns when the players wanted them to.

As for the "voice of the community" on this question: Currently as many as 44,44% of the players are against the idea. 33% like it, but don't think it's truly a great idea. Only two out of nine really likes the idea.

It's not like this is something the community's stated it can't live without.