Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Of course the CFC argument doesn't explain why the 'hole' is over Antartica and not Los Angeles. Also, it's not a 'hole', per se. There is less ozone in that area, but it also changes from season to season, apparently dependant on how much sunlight it gets.
|
Exactly! It's the sun that builds up the ozon! That's why the ozon layer is less dense in winter than in summer. And CFC can't damage the ozon layer becose it never gets up there so high, becose it's simple more heavier than air and actualy fall to the ground and is being absorbed by the flora to whitch it's very tasty. There was almost no CFC in the ozon layer found and the fact that the ocean is by far the greatest CFC producer should give a the final death blow to the CFC argument. I'm just woundering why the sciantists all around the world have never complained ?
CFC/ozon research is maybe a good argument to get funding. There is fraud in sciance too!
AFAIK global warming happens on all planets in our solar system And is related to the increased illumination of the sun or hell knows to what but not to CFC.
Most measure stations for the temperature are supposed to be to close to urban areas whitch emmits alot of warmth and screws up the measurements so that they appear higher than the actualy temperature. I red somewhere once that the temperature in the oceans has actualy even droped, when i remember correctly. Although the smoke blown in to the atmosphere isn't good for us it reflects alot of light back in to space and actualy counters the warming to some extent.
Deamon