SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Skybird · 05-03-25, 03:46 PM

You both must fall back to rethoricla disctraiton, becasue you hav eno case nor argument.

A “deutsche Volkszugehörigkeit" in the implicit sense of an ethnic definition based on historical descent in an ethnic-historical sense is also mentioned in Article 116 of the Basic Law, where it refers to the returning refugees and displaced persons of German descent ("Flüchtling oder Vertriebener deutscher Volkszugehörigkeit") after the Second World War, which can only be explained in ethnic-historical terms, since at that time uncontrolled and non-discriminatory mass immigration to Germany had not taken place at all.

And then there were Willy Brandt and Helmut Schmidt, who spoke the obvious, but today would get crucified for their words :

https://youtube.com/shorts/uco0TTXqPtQ?feature=shared

https://youtube.com/shorts/nYCp8MWveGQ?feature=shared

And finally, I would like to point out that the reasons put forward by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution are contrived and in some cases demonstrably false, and at the same time the authority claims that it does not have to disclose its alleged further “evidence”. Both are massively criticized by lawyers and constitutional specialists and described as untenable, lawsuits are being prepared, and if things go according to plan, which is no longer a matter of course in these times, these lawsuits will be successful. Once again. It is not the first time that pro-government circles and the media have asserted lies as facts in order to achieve mass appeal, knowing full well that the legal correction that follows will do little to contain the agitationally engineered damage.

What follows now will be less of a party ban and more of an attack on party funding, because this will require evidence of the defendant's deeds that prove beyond doubt his hostile attitude towards the constitution and the basic constitutional order. This will be very difficult, as the AfD adheres very strictly to the provisions of the Basic Law - in contrast to the other parties, which ignore precisely those provisions that, for example, affect the rights and duties of the state towards the people, disregard them, hand them over to foreign international authorities and thus transform the democratic processes, the checks and balances, into ceremonial, hollowed-out alibi performances without any substantive relevance and circumvent the will of the three-dimensional majority of the population. The parties commit one micro-coup d'etat after the other, and then justify it with arbitrarily imposed moral concepts, which are then presented as being overruling to the law and the constitution. This is also called arbitrary justice.

All this ^ and much more like it is the reason why more and more people are turning to the AfD, at least start to sympathize with them. The united political left leaves them no other choice - except resignation. The political left as a principle is now considered to have no alternative in Germany. This was the self-justification principle of the GDR dictatorship against its own citizens. "Never again Nazis!", some shout. Where are those who shout “Never again GDR!” ? “Never again socialism!" ? The GDR 2.0 is doing better and better than ever, it's in good health and extremely proper. Its a shame.

So again, to conclude: the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has provided NO EVIDENCE for anything, and refuses to do so. Its president is a Faeser puppet, who had already made a name for herself by overstepping her authority and abusing her office and was criticized after Faeser discredited her conservative predecessor and forced her out of office. This authority is now a danger to democracy from within, and something like a party's own political secret police with a messianic sense of mission and a self-declared mandate to educate the masses. Its current activities make a mockery of the task for which it was once founded, namely to protect the validity of the constitution, just as the Federal Constitutional Court was supposed to protect the citizens from an overreaching government. Both actors have changed sides. Those mainly responsible for this current conspiratorial coup d'etat: the SPD, supported by the Greens, and Nancy Faeser.

It would be so easy to belittle the AfD, which are in fact rude, boorish loudmouths and for the most part not very good at their jobs. Simply govern and make decisions in a better and more responsible way, and stop playing politics against the people and against the majority of the population. But that would be against the socialist authoritative agenda and the EU centralist planned economy and the preparation of the great reset.

Liberty dies by inches.

05-03-25, 03:46 PM	#2699
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,816 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	You both must fall back to rethoricla disctraiton, becasue you hav eno case nor argument. A “deutsche Volkszugehörigkeit" in the implicit sense of an ethnic definition based on historical descent in an ethnic-historical sense is also mentioned in Article 116 of the Basic Law, where it refers to the returning refugees and displaced persons of German descent ("Flüchtling oder Vertriebener deutscher Volkszugehörigkeit") after the Second World War, which can only be explained in ethnic-historical terms, since at that time uncontrolled and non-discriminatory mass immigration to Germany had not taken place at all. And then there were Willy Brandt and Helmut Schmidt, who spoke the obvious, but today would get crucified for their words : https://youtube.com/shorts/uco0TTXqPtQ?feature=shared https://youtube.com/shorts/nYCp8MWveGQ?feature=shared And finally, I would like to point out that the reasons put forward by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution are contrived and in some cases demonstrably false, and at the same time the authority claims that it does not have to disclose its alleged further “evidence”. Both are massively criticized by lawyers and constitutional specialists and described as untenable, lawsuits are being prepared, and if things go according to plan, which is no longer a matter of course in these times, these lawsuits will be successful. Once again. It is not the first time that pro-government circles and the media have asserted lies as facts in order to achieve mass appeal, knowing full well that the legal correction that follows will do little to contain the agitationally engineered damage. What follows now will be less of a party ban and more of an attack on party funding, because this will require evidence of the defendant's deeds that prove beyond doubt his hostile attitude towards the constitution and the basic constitutional order. This will be very difficult, as the AfD adheres very strictly to the provisions of the Basic Law - in contrast to the other parties, which ignore precisely those provisions that, for example, affect the rights and duties of the state towards the people, disregard them, hand them over to foreign international authorities and thus transform the democratic processes, the checks and balances, into ceremonial, hollowed-out alibi performances without any substantive relevance and circumvent the will of the three-dimensional majority of the population. The parties commit one micro-coup d'etat after the other, and then justify it with arbitrarily imposed moral concepts, which are then presented as being overruling to the law and the constitution. This is also called arbitrary justice. All this ^ and much more like it is the reason why more and more people are turning to the AfD, at least start to sympathize with them. The united political left leaves them no other choice - except resignation. The political left as a principle is now considered to have no alternative in Germany. This was the self-justification principle of the GDR dictatorship against its own citizens. "Never again Nazis!", some shout. Where are those who shout “Never again GDR!” ? “Never again socialism!" ? The GDR 2.0 is doing better and better than ever, it's in good health and extremely proper. Its a shame. So again, to conclude: the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has provided NO EVIDENCE for anything, and refuses to do so. Its president is a Faeser puppet, who had already made a name for herself by overstepping her authority and abusing her office and was criticized after Faeser discredited her conservative predecessor and forced her out of office. This authority is now a danger to democracy from within, and something like a party's own political secret police with a messianic sense of mission and a self-declared mandate to educate the masses. Its current activities make a mockery of the task for which it was once founded, namely to protect the validity of the constitution, just as the Federal Constitutional Court was supposed to protect the citizens from an overreaching government. Both actors have changed sides. Those mainly responsible for this current conspiratorial coup d'etat: the SPD, supported by the Greens, and Nancy Faeser. It would be so easy to belittle the AfD, which are in fact rude, boorish loudmouths and for the most part not very good at their jobs. Simply govern and make decisions in a better and more responsible way, and stop playing politics against the people and against the majority of the population. But that would be against the socialist authoritative agenda and the EU centralist planned economy and the preparation of the great reset. Liberty dies by inches. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert. Last edited by Skybird; 05-03-25 at 03:56 PM.