I never said we should not let migrants in. What I say is that if you refuse to chose yourself, if you refuse to define the criterions by which you decide whom you let in (
into your home, that is),
and whom not, then you lose control over migration, and end up with what the left even deliberately want and dmand: totally undiscriminatory mass migration.
We let in too many we have no use for and who are net migrants into our social systems, they cost us more than they and the generation of their children and chikdren's children will attribute, ever. We in Germany do too little to steer and control migration, and choosing those whom we have need for. And those we let in, for them we make it as difficult as possible to fit in and be allowed to work. Thats why we have seen several "flushes" of migrants from a given single place, and after three, four years they mostly have voluntarily left again. Indians in Germany on my mind, there was hope they would ease our need for IT specialists. A few came, felt to not be welcomed, aldso were angry for the high taxes and madatory fees they had to pay, and they left again. Nobody speaks of Indian IT specialists in Germany anymore.
Instead we import the miserable and incapable, the uneducated and the outcasts in their own home places , and these we let in by numbers like a body tsunamy. Worse, we do not deport those who break our laws, who kill, rape, plunder and assault. We shy away from enforcing our laws and our order, af5raid ti be called racists if we would. The deportation quote we acchieve is PATHETIC, unexcusable. Its a bad joke.
It has been several times demonstrated by now that if you look at the cold hard numbers, the migration influx into Germany by netto value is a hige deficit for our social system stability, it costs us much, more more than these newcomers ever pay in. We have been lied to. At the same time the stability and integrity of the social system has not increased, but detoriated. Social peace is being actively destroyed. And so the natives turn angry. What wonder! How dare they...! They are not kind!
And maybe worst of it: like it or not, but peopel prefer to stay with their own kind, and the majority of Germans, the vast majority, does not want more and more streets, districts, towns, parts of Germany being turned into Africa or the Middle East. And these are such that partially not even the plcie dares ot enter such reigosn anymore, at least not if not going in with support by the hundreds.
Not only have we lost control - we actively do not want to get control. Because that would be considered to be "not nice". The Germans' biggest concern is to be seen as "not kind".
But the loss of control is everyhwere, not just in Germany. France is not in control of its Muslim migrant communities anynmore. The UK has tuned poltically insane as well over its Muslim migrants. The Swedes tried to stick their heads into the sand over their immense crime problems with Muslim migrants.
And we all do not have probelms with migrants in general. The migrants causing problems are always from the same places, are always of the same origin: they come from certainb oarts of Africa and the Midde East, and they are Muslim and have Islam in their suitcase. And where Islam is, the ugly hydra raises its many heads, and they become more and more. Brussle completely, completely ignores this. Admitting it would mean two things: that one is not nice and kind because one says how it is, and that one has messed things up and that chosen policies failed. But the EU does not fail. The EU is supreme, devine, superior and never erring. The EU is beyond failure. Its perfect superiority at work.
Seal the borders of Europe.
Of course it can be done, wo says it cannot be done, lies. And then learn from how Australia and Canada, Japan and China do it.
Oh wait, that shall not be. It snot kind to do like them, becasue last but not least they implemnent force. Well, then live on with total loss of any control, and spiral into your doom, stupid Europe.