Quote:
Originally Posted by Ostfriese
Simple: don't believe every bull**** video on youtube. Actually, that's an insult to bull****.
The video is a prime example of a scientific illiterate who doesn't understand even the basics and compensating his lack of understanding with loud, noisy and empty phrases.
|
He is not the first one saying it, he just "reports" it. This damn mRNA technology is no vaccine, but a gene therapy in the end, and they did not get it accepted by regulators before Covid right because it is so very dangerous and noncontrollable. Meanwhile it has been demonstrated that mRNA therapy causes disruptive entry of unwanted stuff into the DNA that does not belong there, the passing of the brain-blood-barrier, the carrying over of mRNA induced changes from mothers to babies in the womb, the transportation of it as well as sensitivties from LongCovid (whose existence also gets denied by many governments) via blood conserves, not to mention the still existing overmortality of mRNA vaccinated people, apparent long term damages to the immune system and on and on and on the list of physical harms go. For ten years Moderna and Co tried to convince regulators in the US to give card blanche for the use of this "technology", and for as long regulators - who usually are in bed with Big Pharma lobbyists and trade office seats with them every couple of years ("swing door effect") - rejected to give it a license, quoting unforseeable and unadressed security effects". The latest cancer mRNA vaccine by Biontech is haunted by a series of undeclared and when becoming known: unexplained deaths, while almost all of the animal test subjects died in the test trials.
And what do the govenrments and "authorities" du? Forbid, ban and suppress talking, mentioning of it, even put it under penalty to object to the official government announcements on the matter (Canada, France as just two exmaples). Youtube bans you and shuts down your video or your whole channel if you dare to use certain words that identify a certain health issue that haunted the world over the past couple of years, you cannot call it by its name anymore. The EU wants social media to self-censor and ban every opinion statement or massively supportedf scientific document that puts the official policies on it in question. The EU wants only its own scoience. Propaganda, that is. Scienc ehtta has fallen in line with ideology and profit interests.
Have none of you really noticed what a verbal egg-dance authors must do in order to keep their content on this matter online at youtube? Have you forgotten that Dr. Campbell had some of his videos taken down, himself being banned for ten days or a week or two weeks, I forgot the exact time?
Have you forgotten that the British Tories commanded their party members in the lower house to attend the - very well-founded - speeches of that fearless critic who repeatedly adressed the topic - and had to speak before a practically empty chamber so that nobody shall hear him?
The latest EU laws demanding social media and message boards to scan their boards for content the EU does not want, and self-censor themselves? Its about suppressing unwanted opinion, of course they label it not that, but give it the shine of a good and moral cause. Like with their climate policies. Social media are wanted by the EU to suppress and censor even scientifically founded posts that put the official views on climate chnage in question.
I remind of the health initiative by the EU that aims at completely regulating and prohibiting the selling of nutritional supplements like vitamine C and vitamine D and the likes in therapeutically effective doses, also that of remedies used in alternative medicine by alternative practioners, first such items got banned from sale in Europe already last year - and we are not talking about homeopathy or some esoteric nonsense! They want what they call "science-founded" cures only, but the "scientific evidence" should be examined by - Big Pharama lobbyists and proxies in the end. Just these days a new "study" was released saying that vitamine D is completel useless, and that we do not need it all, that it even can be bad, and bla anf bl and blablabla. Alllaaaaarm...!!!! . When you look into it you see that they neither established an initial baseline for vitamine D levels in their control and experimental group, nor supplied a therapeutically relevant dose of vitamine D, instead they applied just rediculously low 800 IU of vitamine D, without any further co-factors needed to activate even that meaninglessly low dose not even sufficient for a body as small as that of a baby. Obviously the incompetent study design was from beginning on chosen to produce fake "evidence" for the irrelevance of vitamine D.
Thats the kind of science and evidence the EU and the WHO talk of, and always mean when demanding "scientific evidence". They mean fraudulent claims supported by fake studies designed to support the ideological drive of the EU and the profit greed of big players in the background. In environmental questions. In diet topics. In health topics. In energy topics. In climate topics. They say "science". They mean "propaganda" and the outright prevention of real science. For science is what would unmask them and their bad intentions.
Stop buying their BS and lies and propaganda slogans. Wake up your mind, and start walking upright again, you sleepwalkers. We are getting led to our doom, and you bite the hand pointing at the danger.