Its a user interface with some entertainment value of limited range. There is neither intelligenc ein it, nor awareness. Its just a very complex "Rechenvorschrift" - an algorithm, linked to a huge database from which it pastes and copies as ordered. In other words, just an automat. when I press the button 4 in a lift, i should nto be surprise dif the thigns moves up to fouzrth floor, and when I type in in a library what topic I am looking for, i see no wonder in if books on that topic get brought.
Or as a German journalist recently wrote: it sounds like a schoolkid that in rich, flowery words tlaks about matters that it obviously has zero clue on and that is why it also often procued stellar misassociatiosn and errors that leave you laughing. Also, the replies always are of similir, comparable structure both in syntax and content.
I hate this idiotic term "artificial intelligence".
Personally, I just do not like to talk to a machine interface to give it orders, may it be a chatbot, may it be in the style of the computer aboard the starship Enterprise. I also do not like the "internet of things" and "smart" refrigerators whom I program with voice commands. I tried voice applications under Windows and Android, once, i did not like them either. I like my many typos when typing. I'm used to them, I am fond of them.
I logged an account for ChatGPT a few weeks ago, and very quickly lost interest. Just a few sentences from it and I would have been convinced already to talk to a machine. Turing test not passed, sorry.
Its just a complex database with complex automatic search algorithms.
Are the Synths in Fallout 4 really "humans"? Hardly. The movie Ex Machina however - here it starts to get interesting. Steven Spielbergs "A.I." also is a vision - likable or not - that hints at something what intelligence is about. And that is more than just an algorithm. The whole is more than the sum of all its parts.
There is not even a general definition of intelligence that all scientists would all agree on.