View Single Post
Old 07-21-06, 10:37 PM   #12
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scandium
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by scandium
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Demon
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
What makes you think any of the Muslim leaders could?
What I see is you pull some anti christian thing that is complete crap, and you then have an argument and boil over that argument and continue that argument by avoiding the questions and answers to those questions. So what gives? And, to top it off, you keep doing it over and over, regardless that people give you logical answers to your questions in return. Seems to me that you have some sort of agenda. Care to share with the rest of us?

-S
Thank God the agenda for sale ain't selling.
Agreed. The results when one airs an opinion contrary to the dominant one is a very real threat to a fragile mind or weak character. This is why the current U.S. President surrounds himself with sycophants, appears only before pre-selected audiences composed only of the party faithful, and doesn't read newspapers.
Has nothing to do with that. But you try and twist it that way anyway, but no ones buying.
You know you keep throwing around this "it and "that" but nothing I can read in what you've quoted refers to whatever it is that I'm supposed to be selling, other than that whatever it is its supposedly related to Michael Moore, internet conspiracy theories, and the anti-christ. Maybe I'm not trying to sell anything, maybe you just forgot to take your medication today

Quote:
The simple fact is, you have an article that you can't defend, and it is along the same lines of other threads you have posted in in which you also failed to defend this same idea, yet you continue your twist of incorrect fact in the face of overwhelming logic.
Defend it against what? Nobody's even read the article so what is it I'm supposed to defend?

Quote:
You have gone beyond weak mind and character of yourself by beating a dead horse with only pride (and hidden agenda) as your only fight left - and this is after you have lost, and everyone is just standing around watching you make a fool of yourself.
See above. And I'm not the one beating a dead horse, given that wiuthout even reading the article the thread is about, you never the less saw fit to hijack the thread to berate me on this supposed agenda which you can't even seem to pin down (perhaps because it isn't there). My impression of you so far, just in this thread, is that you are so hysterically fearful of whatever the article might contain that rather than simply debate the merits of it, you instead try and discredit it by shooting the messenger. Yet I have the weak mind?

Quote:
The funny part is the article you are taking from is from a man with an agenda of his own that my family has met one on one personally! It is strictly a politcal motivated article!
Which you haven't even read.

Quote:
Attack Bush allows you to sway democratic votes to your side. We like Buchanan since he upsets the party vote, but that is all we like him for.
Okay now you're just coming completely unglued. As I am not American, I have no "side" to sway votes to; And I poke fun at Bush from time to time because, believe it or not, he's a bit of a laughing stock outside the US and a lot of us foreigners make fun of him. And in a way, its his own fault: I used to laugh at Baghdad Bob as he is by far the funnier of the two, but now there is no longer a Baghdad Bob to laugh at so I have to settle for Bush.

Quote:
I am sorry, i am about to start laughing, but I will keep my composure. The attack on Bush also pathetic since all evidence is to the contrary! He hits the press room all the time with frothing press people ready to tear him up! Too funny!
Its good to know I am not the only one laughing at this exchange, because the idea of Bush taking really confrontational questions in a Parlimentary style debate just cracks me up. I have seen your Washington press in action and the word that comes to mind to me is actually "docile". Trained puppies afraid to lob anything heavier than softballs lest they embarass the Pres and get shut out of further access to him.

Quote:
The only people he won't meet is the NAACP, which I wouldn't either if they associated the dragging of a black man, and his subsequent death as related to me in some way.
No idea what you're talking about here.

Quote:
But, by all means, please continue since this is getting rather entertaining... I'll just stand on the sidelines to watch what happens like everyone else! I'm sure the slinging tomatoes will continue to pummel you.
*shrug* I put out my point of view and if I get some good debate out of it, and I usually do, then that's all I'm interested in. As to slinging tomatoes, I could care less. Fire away.
blah blah blah blah. Obviously you don't even take in what I say, and when I talk about the NAACP, I give you an example to your own arguments, and like with everybody else, your own arguments disappear in smoke when its purely convenient! Nice. What am I talking to here? Someone who has amnesia on comand when it suits his purpose? Seems I missed a lot since I've been gone.

I mean, what does not living in America have to with.. for example? And, when your entire conversation revolves around a man, and then you discount that that is what your conversation is about when its convenient....time to switch back to christians! oh! Time to switch back to Bush!....

The list is endless. your entire reply is all nonsense!

I even see more anti scandium threads popping up! Now why could that be?

-S

PS. Maybe I'll go make one of my own.

PPS. You and Kerry would get along real good - always switching sides!
__________________

Last edited by SUBMAN1; 07-21-06 at 10:40 PM.
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote