Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
The database damage values are not 1-1 damage points to kg.
You'll notice all the LWT's have a warhead of 120 points. 
The ADCAP is rated higher than other torpedoes for the same warhead weight because it has an advanced shaped-charge warhead , that directs a jet of plasma into the hull of the target, very similar to a HEAT round used for anti-armor work.
Additionally, the UTK torpedo has increased damage to create the underkeel effect for the ADCAP when used in this mode.
Thanks for playing.
Cheers,
David
If you are interested... http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTUS_PostWWII.htm
Quote:
Explosive Charge 650 lbs. (292.5 kg) PBXN-103
This is equivalent to about 1,200 lbs. (544 kg) of TNT
|
|
No, No... Formula for calculate percent damages in "DW" same as in "Harpoon":
ARMOR Tgt / ARMOR Wpn = % Damages. Strongly 1 to 1 ! (Except for the doctrines using variable 'DETONATE')
But if You made recalculate explosion weight - so correctly...
Whether more correctly to calculate a Armor/Damage hulls under "Harpoon" formulas? (Damage Points Calculate)
Some values hulls are obviously high, others are too small.
Under keel explosion Is strongly "Hypotetical".
In DW damages areas at 3d model not modelled...
It only rather feigns a level of damages at the expense increase of quantity of an explosive, but on another it cannot be made. There can be this correct decision...
Only MK 48 ADCAP, UTK mode have been. Why other torpedos with a wire control have no an opportunity to shoot under keel?
This is similar "God Help" for US sub drivers. :hmm:
Or I is wrong?