You are too convinced of your article, Scandium. You assume that everyone reading it must see it that way. And if someone does not see it that way and does not agree, then he hasn'T red it. The possebility that people, or me, have red it, but simply are not only not convinced, but turned away by it's suggestive language and massively biased direction does not seem to be on your mind.
You also have defined WHAT goal Israel may go for, but told us only HOW it may NOT do so - we still wait for the answer HOW it should go for it instead. Is this another question you will not answer - while holding others guilty of ignoring your questions for whom answers has been given since long, and often repeatedly? Don't tell us what restricts Israel - tell us what it should do to get rid of the threat by Palestinian terror.
Simple truth is - you don't like what is going on right now. Same for me. But you do not have a realistic alternative to offer that goes beyond the heart-warming daydreaming of the UN and the EU and that could work not only in dreams, but in the grim world that we have. The only world.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Last edited by Skybird; 07-20-06 at 02:41 AM.
|