Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
Well it's up the prosecutor to convince the Jury and the Judge that Trump did it on purpose.
I do hope the jury and the judge is 150 % political neutral and only concentrate on the law.
Markus
|
Did what on purpose? Anyone have a clue what documents were seized? I realize everything is conveniently classified so we just have to take their word for it AGAIN. And the informant is unknown AGAIN, and New York Times has all the information from anonymous “top” White House sources AGAIN.
Now admittedly I may have missed it. But does anyone know what documents were seized? And before you go off half cocked and tell me we don’t know because they’re classified.
It’s been my personal experience handling those kinds of documents they all have in big bold letters the classification of the main text. But before the good stuff there is also a (U) preceding maybe one or two lines of text. That (U) is what’s called the unclas line. That allows someone, anyone to discuss the title of the document without divulging any of the juicy details. Kind of like if I asked you: “hey MARKUS have you seen message traffic about World’s on fire?” You respond: “Nope, what’s it about?” I then tell you: “None of your damn business, let me know if you find it. Now get back to work.”
