Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid
I think you read too much into it. Should the DOJ just ignore evidence because it is inconvienient to a politician, or party? They had to have enough evidence to think they could be granted a search warrant and they were. This doesn't erode my faith in the DOJ but rather enhance it.
Yes, August, Hillary is the antichrist that got away but does that mean it was because of bias, or conspiracy, or ignoring evidence to move forward? If there was enough evidence then the republican party failed to find and present it such that the DOJ would be forced to act, and then there is the nature of how Trump couldn't accept defeat which led to the Capitol riot.
|
There was plenty of evidence against Clinton. You know that Comey and the DOJ just refused to do anything with it. You can't deny she had an illegal mail server containing thousands of classified documents, that she first tried to deny it, then tried to cover it up by destroying it (she claims) and deleting thousands of subpoenaed documents. Far more than Trump is accused of doing with old Presidential records that the FBI has had access to for months.