Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
We're going in circles, but those concerns were not relevant on June 16th. Why would they be now? And more importantly, why are Republicans not citing those concerns as their reason for voting no? You know, instead of lying about some loopholes and budgetary gimmicks?
|
People may or may not agree with the action of sending it back but they have cited those concerns. It’s no secret and all public domain all you have to do is read the amendments. Here’s one source
https://rules.house.gov/bill/117/hr-3967-sa
What do you mean “Why would they now”? It’s been over a month and a half since bill has been passed in the Senate, but the Senate wanted changes concerning among other things one or more of those ‘significant concerns’ and sent it back to the House on 16 June 2022. What’s suddenly “now” after a month and half is all the sensationalism and howling in unison how “they just don’t care, it’s just about the money, they’re lying about loopholes, and hating veterans etc etc.
https://www.usmedicine.com/clinical-...on-over-years/
Interesting paragraph
Quote:
|
After extensive negotiation, however, Democrats and Republicans crafted an amended version of the bill that both sides could live with, passing it last month, 84 to 14. The amended bill was then handed back to the House, where it is almost assured to pass.
|
Seems they thought it was almost assured to pass after being sent back to the house. But it’s been almost a month and half now and there it sits in congress. If I’m not mistaken it doesn’t even have to go back to the Senate again. Why hasn’t it left the house for the president to sign? Media hype, mid terms, fanboi politics and drama is all I can think of. Or is what the senate wanted changed so truly horrifying.