Well, me too. I agree with the diagnosis that climate becomes warmer, and that humans significantly contribute to that effect by accelerating it. But i disagree wiht many of the conclusions drawn from that. I think it cannot be reversed by human action and in short time. What would be needed is to adapt (to living on a much warmer planet). But this I cannot see being done, instead: reality denial and the attempt to push back time by a hundred years. Also: massive abuse of ecology topics for implementing social engineering and wealth redistribution schemes and left-leaning socialist, even openly Marxist community models. A fundamental hijack of science, and a collective sanctionising and censoring of every scientist disagreeing with this "mainstream dogma". I disagree with the naive idea of that deindustrialisation and destroying technology would make the world better. But many seem to believe exactly this. I think without technology we are doomed to go extinct, and that technology, stemming from our human intellect our species has formed out, is part and self-expression of our species' biological evolution. Rejecting technology means rejecting evolution. However, I am against uncritical and unreflected naive excessive over-use of technology. Every coin has two sides.
And a side rim.
