Quote:
So how does the German chancellor view these interrelationships? Is his view appropriate? Doubts are reasonable. And they are now being voiced. And from the ranks of his own coalition. In his press conference after the visit to Putin, Scholz said that Putin's genocide accusation was "false." He said no more. In response to a question from an American senator at the Munich Security Conference, Scholz called Putin's "genocide" accusation: "Ridiculous."
Scholz also scoffed at Putin's historical "unity" article: "Putin has acted as a historian and written texts." Strange: Olaf Scholz deliberately does not want to deal with Putin's motives, his understanding of identity and his historical justifications. Why?
Scholz himself says: "If we were to take him at his word, that would not allow us to look optimistically into the future. I refuse to do that."
In other words, Scholz refuses to take Putin seriously on this point because it would then cloud his optimism. Seriously now? What if Putin is serious about everything: about invading, about "genocide," about Russia's unity across existing state borders?
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
|
https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland..._56583708.html
Scholz always is absent, even when he stands there and makes some noise with his mouth. He always is totally disconnected form the reality around him, appears apathic, seems to be completely uninterested, you do not so much see him for himself, but you are aware of him only by that where he should be there is just kind of a hole that covers the background behind it. And because you cannot see that part of the backgroudn your relaise that there should be something in the foreground - just that you cannot see that thing in the foreground. A misty cloud that moves and changes form all the time, never takes clear contour and shape and form, mad eof highly polsiehd Teflon particles so that nothign cna stiock to it, nothign can be seen in it, nothing can be interpreted into it. Pure nothingness. In interviews he often ignores the quesiton and babbles down a prepared text, and when being asked again he repeats that text more or less and when being pressed a third time, he repeats that text. There is no link between what he says and what he is, and the reality we others live in. His way of speaking is lame, sedating, boring, monotonous.
He is very strange, there is something about him that triggers all my instinctive alarm sensors. I call him bubble-Olaf because he seems to live in his own alternate reality all the time. Even if he is here he is not really here. Very alienating figure. Even his own party does not really like him.