[Skybird]

Voting polticians out of office is NOT "holding them accountable". Its only to send them off the scvene of their cirme, while they can keep all the profits it earned them financially and socially. Liable they would be if they owuld need to cpnesate with their private property andf belongings, even their lives, for the damages they inked with their decisions.



It compares to catchign a bank robber and brignbing him to court (elections). There he is being told by the bank he robbed that he is not allowed into any of its offices and buildings anymore and will not be allwoed ot maintain a ban account. He can however keep the moeny he has stolen, and walk away as a free man. Thats a politician's "accountability".


And then there is the symbolic drama queen stuff. A politician needs to clean his reputation of abad or inc0ket5ent legacy ha casued. What doe she do? Well he has a copy of Harry Potter's almanach with magical spells, in there he looks up the spell that is the antidot against being held liable, it goes: " I hereby accept the potlical repsoinsibility", and abrakadabra, tatarataaa: "all rdepsinbility falls of his burdned shoulders, he must not bear any comensation, any respnsibility, he is lcean again and can wlak off and show up for office in some othe rpost as if nothiugn eve rhappened.


Has anyone noticved that even potlicians that got driven out of a post - as if by magic tend to pop up again, all their life long again and again, moving from one post to the next, because they all are so omnipotent, intellectual supermen?


Thats why I saY: "dont vote for them. Do not morally and oratically legitimise them. Do not trade away your moral right to criticise the, becasue if you yuthorize them to coimmit their cirmes of which you shoul.d know they do them, you have no morla righ tnamyore to crioticise them: because you knew they woudl do what they do when you authprozed them to do it." You become an accomplice by giving your vote.


Do not oby the state. Do no cooperate with the state. Do not help the state. Do not assist the state. Do not legitimise the state for anything voluntarily. Do not accept to sign the state a moral legitimation of any sorts. The state is not the "Vater", it is not your friend, it does not mean it well with you, it is not an equal contractor meetign you on same eye level, it manipulates its home-made rules to serve its ambitions and to submit you to them, it prevents you more and more from legally resisting to its claims for ever growing powers. The state is our worst enemy. Or in Nietzsche's words: "the states are the coldest of all monsters." All states are, "theirs" as well as "ours". Like economic markets have an inherent drive to form monopolies that consumers must prevent by making their consuming choices accordingly to boost competition and prevent monopolies, states have inherent drives to let bureaucracy grow like cancer and to monopolise ever more and more powers. Thats why ever y state, no matter what format and ideology it is founded on, always and inevitably leads to and ends in tyranny and dictatorship and total authoritarianism. Always.


All states on Earth must be brought to an end. All superregional governance must end. Service companies must take over, bound to regiuonal customers (former ciotiozens) by contracts that allows both sides to sue the other for compensation if it violates its contract duties. Law enforcvment must turn this way, too, both police-like service as well as jurisdictional adminstration.



What we have today instead, is nothing else but a continuation of millenia-old feudal structures that only have feudal lords and serfs, subject that are being owned and told they owe the lords obedience and their working force. Clever cosmetics are used to hide this, but thats the basic structure of our modern states, and I do not take neither Germany nor the United States as exceptions. They are not.