Quote:
Originally Posted by 3catcircus
Whether you like him or not, Trump negotiated from a position of strength backed by a willingness to do what is necessary to hold that other party to the terms of whatever agreement is reached or moving on and ending such agreements if the other party remains recalcitrant. He was also willing to demand that *new* terms be negotiated when presented with agreements that are one-sided and that gain the US nothing (NAFTA, Paris Climate, Iran nuclear deal, etc.). Every Dem administration going back to at least Clinton send to always agree to things that were decidedly not beneficial to the US and it's citizens (but definitely beneficial to them personal finances of Clinton, Biden, Kerry, Obama, etc.) We deserve leaders who are more concerned with the well being off the citizens that are supposed to serve rather than in lining their own pockets.
|
I'm sorry, but that is not the timeline I live in. Trump agreed to pull out NO MATTER WHAT, by the time of May he wanted to be out, and he got NO/ZERO/RIEN con cessions by the Taleban. Nothing. What eh claims he would have done in some imaginery alternative future scenario, is his claim only, and nothign pof it was in any form bound in a legal olbiation or treaty.
The Taleban wwere given everything. And they had to give back nothing. Thats the simple truth in the universe I have live dfin ion the past months and years. The Donald claims a lot when the day is long. Its his hobby. No substance, just claims, and repeating them endlessly even if they have been proven wrong.