View Single Post
Old 08-15-21, 09:58 AM   #128
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,737
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Austrian "Die Presse" writes:

Brussels is currently considering a central "property register" for all inmates of the Union. This is not a good idea because it not only makes money laundering more difficult. When new standards in the European Union are justified by the fact that they are necessary to combat money laundering and tax evasion, a certain amount of skepticism is always required. For example, if, as just planned, an upper limit for the use of cash is to be introduced, which not only makes money laundering more difficult, but above all enables the control and taxation of citizens. -

In this light, a call for tenders by the EU Commission will also have to be assessed, which was placed discreetly online in the middle of the summer when many journalists are on vacation in Brussels. A feasibility study for a future "EU asset register" is being put out to tender. The Commission itself expresses its aim openly: “The aim of this project is to examine various options for collecting information on the establishment of an asset register, which can then be used in a future political initiative. The aim is to examine how information available from various sources of property ownership (e.g. land registers, business registers, trust and foundation registers, central securities depositaries, etc.) can be collected and linked, and the design, scope and challenges for such a Union property register. ”Further:“ The possibility of including data on the ownership of other assets such as cryptocurrencies, works of art, real estate and gold in the register must also be taken into account. ”(“ Feasibility study for a European property register in With regard to combating money laundering and tax evasion ", 2021 / S 136-358265 of July 16, 2021) -

What emerges here - possibly, the matter is still at the beginning - is the financially transparent EU citizen whose property, from the hoarded gold coins to the account balance, can be called up at any time. You don't have to suffer from severe paranoia to find this strange. The mere fact that tax authorities can de facto gain access to every account without any problems is incompatible with the discretionary claim of a bourgeois-liberal society. The idea that in future a central authority will be able to access the property status of every EU inmate is even more worrying. -

The argument that someone who has nothing to hide does not have to shy away from transparency falls short of the mark. Countries like Germany or Austria, with their sometimes excessive data protection requirements, should understand this. Because here not only abuse is to be feared, but a total access of the state to all assets of its citizens, should that one day be politically desired. As a reminder: At the height of the corona crisis, it was not possible to collect data that was absolutely sensible in order to meet data protection requirements. For the lame and flimsy argument “money laundering” this has to apply even more. -

An EU property register makes much more sense if you follow the debate in Canada: In view of the highly inflated national debt caused by the corona, the head of the social democratic New Democratic Party proposes that the wealthy be subject to a property tax of one percent per year; other “Tax the Rich” proponents are calling for a one-off tax of three percent. -

The problem with such taxes has been that they are difficult to implement because the tax office cannot always know which valuables the taxpayer has deposited where. Unless, of course, he is forced from the outset and under threat of punishment to report his entire property to the authorities - ideally across Europe so that loopholes do not arise in the first place. This has relatively little to do with money laundering - but such an “asset register” is an excellent preparation for partial expropriations. -


----


Earlier this month, the german ministry for financial crime, expropriation, blackmailing and money inflation, and the godfathers of the organised crime in the government and parliament have turned active a new law that quietly reversed a basic pillar of western law, namely the presumption of innocence. Due to the now existing obligation to provide receipts for cash deposits of annual sums of over 10,000 euros, everyone who has monetary values is ultimately declared a criminal who no longer even has to be accused of the crime, but who, by definition, is criminal because of circumstances - until he has proven himself as innocent. The criminal act, the crime no longer has to be proven, the claim of guilt must not be proven anymore - the accused must prove his innocence instead. The propaganda lie, with which this is excused, is of course the fight against tax evasion and money laundering, the usual opportunistic bull. As if organised crime would be affected in any way by this! Of course the purpose is another one: plundering ordinary people's private savings that they have withdrawn from bank accounts so that banks can no longer steal penalty fees for savings beyond 50000 and 100000 euros , and pushign people to abandoning cash payment and money and accept digital money exclusively - and then being totally helpless and defenceless against any taxation, expropriaton and plundering by banks and government and the EU. That is the only reason and always has been the only reason why they want to destroy cash money use.

While they of course say nobody wants to destroy cash money.

And Walther Ulbricht said nobody had the intention to build an inner-German wall.



And Bush said they know that the had them and where they are (Iraq's claimed nukes).

The worst and most malicious criminals and gangster all sit in government, central banks, and ministries.

I will not resist any violent revolution that overthrows these conditions and kills them mafia scumbags all, like the French revolution got rid of the French aristocratic class in a very brutla and overboardening fashion, and then drowned all France in blood. If these criminal ways are their vision for the future, I prefer the brutal alternative as self-defence. This scum has long since started with pushing its crimes too far. They render people like me defenceless against their coups and want people like me and all population helpless and naked and dependent and completely at their mercy, and that is when I do not mind anymore to see it all getting destroyed, because then I have nothing to lose anymore, only maybe something to win.

When I made my quarterly payment to balance my banking account (I hold no money savings on bank accounts anymore, since years), I was treated like a terrorist and threatened with prosecution and a mission started on me by the Finanzfahndung if I do not file receipts and documentations within shortest time.

I hope I live to see it all going up in flames. Because I am pissed beyond recovery.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 08-15-21 at 10:08 AM.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote