[Skybird]

I said superobvious, and I include video anaylsis in it, because that is what they have implemented it. I did not watch the match and do not comment much on the ref, I saw a small video from the German TV broadcast, and I thought "hu?". But then they showed the same scene from the other side of the action, and that si what the video ref must have seen as well - and then it was super-dooper-obvious.

If they implement video eviodence for football matches and then such decisions ike that are the result, they can dismantle it again, because then it is useless. That penalty should not have been with video analysis on.

I read the Danish internet is erupting with fire and lava. I can understand them. The match was stolen from them.

Again, I do not comment on the teams performances and on the ref's full match performanc , I have not seen it. But this penalty was what decided the match. And it should not have been given, there is no excuse for it. Video should have corrected it. Thats what they implemented it for.

Total system failure, maximum damage possible.


I also read that the English did not play too well? And that in that shape the Italians just will have a light breakfast with them?