Quote:
|
Which is exactly what Jihadwatch promotes - hysteria. That article is about as meaningful as this random sample from Google news:
|
What these two disconnect cases have to do with each other and how you intend to make one remove the significance of the other, I don't know, but to each his own.
If we followed scandium, we wouldn't study nor Islam nor violence nor Niger nor Canada, we wouldn't know anything and wouldn't be able to do anything nor in Niger nor in Canada. Is the real worthless thing really random Jihadwatch "articles"?
I will remove the relativism:
The news in Niger has a victim being stoned to death by a mob for distributing leaflets. She was arrested for her letter because in Niger there is no freedom of expression or religion, and the angry mob invaded the police station where she was taken to and killed her inside it, meaning the state of Niger can't protect its own citizens. Nobody will be punished for this crime, while it is a crime in Niger's law, it is not in Sharia, and while the letter was not a crime in Niger's law, it was in Sharia.
The Calgary news has two Female murderers, one 23 years old and the other 12, they are accused of murdering 3, not with stones or sharp pieces of iron, they did not invade a police station and neither does a pair constitute a mob. Likewise, no angry mob attempted to invade the police station or Jail or court where they were to kill them. There is no conflict of law. No religion is even mentioned.
The only worthless thing here is the continous attempt to shut the curtains, stop the debate, cease discussion, with relativism, pointing similar cases which have nothing to do with the matter at hand. The only significance a murder in Calgary has with a discussion about Islam is what is its place in Islamic law?