Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockstar
|
Those of us who actually understand science and math and who weren't pushing a political agenda were laughed at months ago for saying that PCR Ct are way too high and that PCR in the absence of symptoms should not be used as a confirmation - someone tested in such a fashion could have had COVID weeks ago, not known it, and recovered - and PCR would still find viral debris - and this has overinflated the statistics of the dead because many many places have recorded a positive test within 30 days to be a covid-19 death.
I'd even go so far as to consider the following claim to be closer to true than not:
Flu season has always consisted of people being infected by influenza and various beta coronaviruses, and it has only been this past year where we actually tried to test everyone where we've found a fraction of everyone who actually is infected. In the past, when someone died with influenza-like symptoms and in the absence of a positive flu test, it was chalked up to a generic pneumonia - no one was testing for coronaviruses, adenoviruses, RSV, etc. except in specific instances such as infants and kids. That is - we've *always* had many more deaths involving cold and flu season that were never attributed correctly because no one ever had a reason to pay close attention before. Combine that with an annual flu vaccine that is on average only 40% effective every year, and lots of those pneumonias have a cause that no one has ever bothered to find.