[Skybird]

You forget the charming penetration power of birth rates. Anglosaxons: very low, non-maintaining. Immigrating ethnicities: high, pushing group sizes up. Another perspective on birth rates which is true in europe as well as in North America, Japan, Russia, Korea: families of high social status and high education standards: low birth rates, or no children at all, in the name of job and career. Families of low social status and low education levels: high birth rates. Just adding this, for fun: there are undisputed correlations between later success and social status, career and education level of offsprings, and the educational and social level of their parent's families. you have better chances in life if you come from a "good" family. Well, tjhat is nothing new.The politically most incorrect statement here is that more and more children get raised in social environments that promsie to keep them down and uneducated, while less and lesser children get raised in an environment that helps them to gain higher social status and education. The "elites" get smaller in size, the class of the "working poor" increases. Pointing at that violates the docritne of the left that all men shall be equal and shall have the same chances, so it is massively rejected, at least over here.But looking at our schools, and the public niveau of eduaction in the widest sense tells me that they are wrong in their rejection. I have two highschool treachers in my group of friends, both of them agree with me and see a direct link between children's home, and their problems at school. Also, no surprise. And besdies birth rates and hostile colonization and unlimited immigration, these issues also are ways to bring down and destroy the integrity of a national community/society.