View Single Post
Old 06-13-06, 06:59 PM   #30
goldorak
Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linton
Goldorak, you made a rather sweeping statement that you would not like to see some of the dw changes put into sc, but never explained why,so for the second time why do you object to this?
There is nothing to explain, Dw has features that will never be able to be included in SC short of someone stealing the source code.
How are you going to add multistation ?
How are you going to add an integrated naval battlespace ?
How are you going to add a new sonar model etc... ?

Lets get real, SC evolved into SCX/SCU because of illegal tinkering.
And this crippled not only the community but SCS as well.
No wonder they are trying to enforce a strict no mod policy on DW with regards to playable units.

Players should realize that they had a free ride with SC but now SCS is in command again and the future is with DW not with SC.
And if players are allways bitching why can't we mod this why can't we mod that and in repsonse they go back to sub command they are not supporting SCS and we as a whole will likely not see another game from them.
Is that what we want ?

Look this whole bitching on the mod capability of DW with respect to SC I've already seen it in exactly the same way with the Falcon 4 franchise.
In that community there are a lot of players and modders so pissed off at LP for having a very strict control (to say the least) on Falcon 4 that they prefer to not support F4 AF, go back to playing a dead game such as Falcon 4. Now how dumb is that ?
The only effect they will have is that of trying to kill the Falcon 4 franchise.
Really stupid thing if you ask me.

I say accept the fact that SCS controls DW, and be happy for the day they decide to release new playable units.
They are in control, not us its as simple as that.

Last edited by goldorak; 06-13-06 at 07:08 PM.
goldorak is offline   Reply With Quote