View Single Post
Old 03-27-20, 03:47 PM   #13
nazaka
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 75
Downloads: 54
Uploads: 0
Default

Okay, but did you get a good look at my test at 2000 meters?

It clearly indicates that the ship's I.D. is incorrect for this vessel.

If we quickly recalculate with the corrected height (27.6m instead of 22.6m), we get:
Theoretical ratio: 86.9/27.6=3.149
observed ratio: the same as before, 3.067 (if we take your approximation of 3.2, we are higher than the theoretical value, not top but comprehensive)

3.067/3.149 X 100=97.4%

And we obtain with the Gegnerlage Berechnungstabelle: 77°.
Let a real AOB of 103

Anyway, all this to say that maybe we should check the values in the ship's identification book.


PS: my english is pretty bad too, I can thank DeepL for the translation
nazaka is offline   Reply With Quote