You could defend a murderer staying in office with that flawed logic ^.
Even leading personell must be counterchecked and monitored. Your system makes itr an issue of party loyalty and corrupt gang bulding whether or not a corrupt leader gets held accountable. What you have this way, is not a president, but an emperor.
You also allow the maximum of time being given to the offender to maximise the overall damages he causes by his ignorrance of laws and rules. I think it is wiser to interrupt him, to prevent him from keeping to do what he is doing when breaking laws, and to prevent damages getting maximised.
An offender is an offender, and if there is evidence that he is, he must be removed for powers - and must be remived NOW, not just at the end of the legislation term, and only if the voter agrees. An offender is an offender. A state leader shall nbot be allwoed to stand above the law. He should in fact setting an exmaple in following the laws.
It seems to me that Western election frequntly just spill the foulest dirt to the top of the hierachy, everyhwere. The liars, the cheaters, the psychopaths, tthe fraudsters, the criminals, the corrupt, the narcissists, the self-servants.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
|