Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
If you are doing it intentionally, to harass or discriminate. Yes, absolutely.
As for the rest of your post: please don't assume I'm defending anyone here.
|
Okay, if you say so.
So you are saying not complying with the utmost hilarious and absurd pervertations of language based on esoteric, narcissim, anti-scientific belief and ideolgocial power-play should be punishable: If you are doing it intentionally, to harass or discriminate. Yes, absolutely.
What has not complying with these implications to do with harassment and discrimination. What had Rowlings's recent defending of that there are women and that there are men to do with discrimination and harassment. Its fact. She just said the most obvious. And here now comes oyu saying that referring to men as men and women as women, is discmrination and harassment.
I leave it here. You illustrated yourself, and repeatedly. I wait for the day when the first complaint will be filed that 2 + 2 has a result of 4, and somebody feels offended by that and demands it to be 5 and 7 as well, and says that a result of 4 is discrimination of those believing this mathematical term solves for a result of whatever he/she/it feels like.
Damn, I need a homeopathic globuli now to get down again.