Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
My idea in simpel was that instead of all the charging stations they develop some kind of batteries that is light and with high capacity
|
You are aware that this "simple idea"
is exactly the crux with batterie development? Light and hjigh capacitzy, that is like having two lottery jackpots simultaneously.
The first man developing and licensing such battery will get stinking, stinking rich.
I know an alternative: produce the electric power aboard the car. Have according fuel on board, like Diesel-electric locomotives, these indeed run with electric engines, since long, long time. The idea is not new: its about hydrogen cars. Producing hydrogen costs resources and energy. But then, just this week once agaion a new study was repported about in Germ,an newspaper that showed thast the proruction of electricity for charging e-batteries and the production of e-cars and batteries and engines themselves, make the who,e rpdiciuton ebven more emmision-.,intensive, tha operating gas-driven cars.
We decei ourselves if thinking e-cars and batteries allow us to clean our ecological footprint without needing to most dramatically limiting consummation in general. Chasing phantoms, thats what we do. There is indicaiton that we do even RAISE emissions with switching the economy to producing e-cars, batteries and the likes. The dinriect, the sdecindary ecological costs of e-cars and e-car power prüpduction are usually not talked about.
I slowly start to think that it doe s not matter so much whether our cars run by e-engines or gas-engines.
What makes the difference is that we have so damn many of these cars. And it becomes more every day and week.
WE ARE TOO MANY.
And recently, first time evber I nheard some scoientoist vpoicing a silent suspicion that I held since two or three years now. He said that they already can measure that duie to the evber grpwiong number of windmills beign ste up the loss of energy in the wind already m akes itsel ffeölt in slower movement opf air masses. which is the reaosn, he argues why we have a growing number on extreme intesne rain in germany and centrla europe. If you take the wind to have it running windmills, you take energy out fo it, and the wind is weaker b ehidn the windmill than it was before it. Simple physics: from nothign comes nothing, windmills do not collect some mysterious orgon energy from the air. Have the win strema passing through dozens and hundreds, and over the distanc ehtorugh thousands of wind,mills, and the loss of enery in it is real, not just theoretical.
WE ARE TOO MANY. Too many people, too many cars, too many energy consumers, too many windmills, too many of just everything. Either we learn that outselves, our nature teaches us. But learning it either way we will.