Quote:
|
have the potential to have them in the future, either by intent or mistake, so you're wrong.
|
Right. So switch it to a man who has had his testicles cut off by a tragic lawn mower accident. Or anyway in which a man and woman cannont have a child due to medical reasons.
And answer the question in that way.
Or just refuse to again, because it dismisses the entire point.
And you are wrong about the dictionary. Yes, it simply lists the legal definition. If gays are allowed to marry, guess what, the dictionary isn't going to keep the old definition as some sort of politcal statement.
Good lord.
Quote:
|
Are you seriously implying that gays are responsible for womens sufferage and freeing the slaves?
|
I'm implying that it's foolish to whine about people who are trying to change things and act like the status que has always been great and never needed changing.
Duh, get it?