Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
I'm lost, I do not understand the reasoning behind this:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48357017
So if she would get her deal through, which is so supersoft a Brexit then that the meaning of Brexit cannot be recognised in any of it anymore, and if therefore she would have gotten what she wanted all the time - her deal rendering Brexit meaningless being accepted and thus rendering Brexit meaningless - she then wants to give parliament a vote on deciding wether there will be another referendum that then should, so i suppose, overrule the first one?
Is there something I do miss? It makes less sense to me than just "none". In a time when it is claimed that there could be "negative interests" that still be interests by definition, is there now also something like "negative sense"? |
This is her way of trying to appease those MP's who currently won't vote for her Bill and represent constituencies who voted to leave.
If she gets Parliament to accept her Bill she has achieved what she originally set out to do but what happens after that is of absolutely no concern to her.
She is a Prime Minister in name only right now.