I see. Trying to be consistent, disqualifies you to be a "radical", and corrupting argument and straight thought, enobles you to be a "moderate".
Certainly explains why so many luke-warm promise-raisers and straightout fraudsters and plunderers can make it to rank and fame in politics and maximise the damages they cause, always at the longterm cost of the people.
Since this is so, I rather be as radical as is possible for me to achieve. I may loose on society that way, but I keep my integrity that way. And of the two, the latter is so much more worth to me.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
|